🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.